Home

Mike McMahon AUSD
BOE Meetings Assessment Facilities FinancesFavorite Links

May Revise for 2006/07

Act II

In January, 2006 the Governor submits his proposed budget to the Legislature. This is the first act in the a three part play. The second act occurs in May with the May Revise and finally the third act is the actual passage of the budget.

Initial reaction to the May Revise was cautious optimism from the California School Boards Association, California Teachers Association and Association of California School Administrators. In late May, the California Teachers Association took the unusual step of endorsing the Governor's budget and began on working on its passage.

Legislative Analyst Office Review of 2006 May Revise

Gov. Offers Ambitious Plan for State's Budget Windfall

By Evan Halper and Nancy Vogel, Los Angeles Times, May 13, 2006

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced a $131.1-billion revised budget plan Friday that would reduce the state's debt, increase school funding, launch new healthcare and law enforcement programs and build the biggest reserve in nearly a generation.

But the proposed $2.2-billion rainy-day fund — the largest in California since 1978 — may be at least partly illusory: A large chunk of it would be immediately swallowed up by pay boosts for tens of thousands of state employees, more than half of whom are preparing to strike after working without a contract for nearly a year.

The spending blueprint includes no raises for about 153,000 state workers — janitors, prison guards, Department of Motor Vehicles clerks and others — whose contracts end this year. The last pay increase state workers received, in the 2004-05 budget year, averaged 5%. Granting such a raise again would cost the state $600 million this year. Some union leaders say their rank and file are due even more.

The governor's proposals would dip into state coffers flush from a surge in tax revenue to give hospitals and public health agencies a one-time infusion of $400 million to provide medicine, equipment, special staff and thousands of emergency beds. The money — far more than any other state allocates — would help prepare California for an outbreak of avian flu or a natural disaster.

The budget includes money to strengthen the state's levees — $500 million to begin repairing decades-old ones immediately and "help protect the people of California from a Katrina-style disaster."

Schwarzenegger would provide schools an extra $2 billion to buy books, hire counselors, expand arts programs and meet other needs. It's money that educators and the governor have been tangling over since he borrowed it to balance the state's books two years ago.

Schwarzenegger committed to repaying schools an additional $3 billion in coming years.

The state's chronic budget imbalance, which was nearly $10 billion when he signed his first budget in 2004, would fall to $3.5 billion.

Beyond repayment of the school funds, few of the new programs Schwarzenegger is proposing require spending into future years. He urged lawmakers not to deviate from that path.

"I am committed to fiscal discipline," Schwarzenegger said at a news conference to unveil the spending plan. "No one wants to go back to the old days … when we were bleeding red ink.

"We must continue to move forward so our financial health gets even stronger," he said.

Passage of the state budget requires approval by two-thirds of the Legislature, necessitating bipartisan support. Lawmakers in both parties voiced optimism that a budget could be in place by the state's July 1 deadline.

Late budgets have been a recurring problem, disrupting payments to schools, contractors and local agencies and tarnishing the state's credit rating.

"The governor's plan to use these resources for debt reduction and increasing the reserve is sensible," said Senate Republican leader Dick Ackerman of Irvine.

Assembly Majority Leader Dario Frommer (D-Glendale) said: "I call it 'Extreme Makeover: Political Edition.' This is an election-year budget that's clearly calculated to pacify some of the governor's critics …. [W]e in the Assembly are delighted that this budget reflects priorities that Democrats have."

The two Democrats hoping to unseat Schwarzenegger in the fall voiced different views. State Controller Steve Westly said the plan is too reliant on a one-time windfall. State Treasurer Phil Angelides said the governor should do more for schools and further reduce the debt.

Some union officials said the administration should have set aside money for state workers.

"Obviously, Gov. Schwarzenegger places no value whatsoever on the work that our members do to keep California healthy, safe and strong," said Jim Hard, president of Service Employees International Union Local 1000.

The union represents the 87,000 state employees working without a contract. Union officials say one-third of its members earn less than $32,000. They are demanding that the governor allocate $400 million in the budget to raise those salaries to match those in local governments.

On Monday, thousands of the rank and file protested against the governor at the Capitol. Union leaders are moving forward with a strike vote and say their members could start walking off the job in mid-June. Administration officials say such a strike would be illegal.

Schwarzenegger said no money was set aside for raises in his new budget because the administration is still in negotiations with state employee unions. The money can be allocated after talks are over, he said.

Department of Finance Director Mike Genest said the administration would use the reserve to cover those costs.

As Hard angles for a fight, other state employee union leaders are taking a wait-and-see approach.

Chuck Alexander, the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn.'s executive vice president, expressed confidence that the roughly 25,000 prison officers he represents will work out a deal with the administration. Their contract expires July 1.

"I'm very optimistic that the administration will come to the table, and we can work out some deal," Alexander said.

The governor announced that state revenues have exceeded official forecasts by $7.5 billion. Nearly $5 billion is already in state coffers; the rest is the result of revised projections.

Genest said about a third of the windfall is from taxes on stock market earnings and other capital gains. He said much of that is probably a one-time surge that the administration is not projecting for next year.

The governor's budget would expand a program to provide preschool to low-income families. Schools would get grants of $25 per student for art and music programs and additional money for supplies for such programs. New money would be set aside to hire more counselors for seventh- through 12th-graders.

Some of the school money would go for new gym equipment, library materials and expansion of vocational education programs. Overall, per-student spending would increase from its current level of $10,325 to $11,268.

California Medical Assn. Chief Executive Jack Lewin said the $400 million proposed for emergency preparedness "defines California as a leader among the states in preparing for the threat posed from a pandemic."

The program would create two mobile field hospitals with a total of 400 beds, and equip existing hospitals with more than 41,000 "alternate care beds." It also would pay for 3.7 million doses of antiviral medicines and double the availability of ventilators in the state.

About 24,000 low-income children who are on waiting lists for county healthcare programs would receive coverage under the governor's proposal. And the state would launch a 20-year plan to build 10,000 units of housing for the mentally ill.

The administration is moving forward with plans to cancel a scheduled $114-million increase for child care for welfare recipients, saying use of the program has decreased. County social service officials have countered that the funds are sorely needed.

State parks, fish and wildlife restoration initiatives, and habitat conservation would get a boost, as would a program to reduce greenhouse gases.

In the area of law enforcement, the governor's plan would add $142 million. The money would be spent on new prosecutors, investigators and advocates for a special unit to prosecute "particularly heinous" crimes such as rape and child abuse. More officers also would be added to community crime prevention programs that target at-risk youth. Some of the funds would be used in efforts to reduce recidivism among mentally ill offenders.

Times staff writers Dan Morain and Peter Nicholas contributed to this report.

The highlights

A windfall of tax revenue has left Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger billions of dollars to spend beyond what he proposed in January. Here is where he wants to put the money:

$400 million

  • For emergency preparedness — hospital beds, medicine and equipment to prepare for a pandemic flu or natural disaster.

    $2.2 billion

  • In a rainy-day fund, the biggest since 1978.

    $2 billion

  • Partial repayment of money the state borrowed from schools.

    $3.2 billion

  • Early payment of state debt.

    Source: Times reporting

    TOP

    Schools ready for influx of funds

    Spending plan offers teacher raises, better classroom materials

    By Jim Sanders , Sacramento Bee, May 14, 2006

    For the first time in years, California public schools are facing the prospect of a massive infusion of state funds for priorities ranging from art classes and counseling programs to teacher pay hikes. "You have to marvel at what a difference a year makes," quipped Scott Plotkin, executive director of the California School Boards Association.

    Education leaders are applauding Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger after a bitter period of acrimony, finger-pointing and loud accusations that the Republican governor had reneged on funding promises. Schwarzenegger unveiled a state budget Friday that calls for a cumulative $5.1 billion increase in public school funding for this year and next, including a jump of $2.8 billion due largely to soaring state revenue since January.

    "I've always said that education is my passion and that children should have the first run at our treasury," Schwarzenegger said. "Because of our fantastic economic growth, education is now fully funded."

    Schwarzenegger's proposal now will be considered by the Legislature.

    The proposed $5.1 billion increase does not include a $3 billion bonanza that schools will receive from 2007-08 through 2013-14 to settle a lawsuit claiming that public education has been shortchanged in recent years.

    "I don't think you're going to find anyone quarreling with what the governor has done here," said Kevin Gordon, president of School Innovations and Advocacy, a lobbying group for school districts.

    Highlights of Schwarzenegger's proposed education budget include:

    • A 5.92 percent cost-of-living adjustment for school programs. Teachers are expected to push for a pay increase of that percentage or more when they negotiate with local school districts.
    • $400 million for classroom and laboratory materials that can range from glue sticks to lab supplies and printer cartridges.
    • $300 million to be distributed in differing amounts, based on a formula, to help equalize funding to school districts.
    • $250 million for instructional materials, and $250 million for physical education equipment and supplies.
    • $200 million for middle and high school counselors.
    • $166 million to support art and music instruction in elementary and middle schools.
    • $50 million for the first phase of a $145 million expansion of preschools serving 4-year-olds from low-performing schools.
    • $50 million for the purchase of vocational education equipment and materials, and $75 million for library materials.
    • $70.5 million to expand supplemental instruction for students needing to pass the California high school exit exam.

    Alan Bersin, Schwarzenegger's secretary of education, said the windfall ensures an "extraordinary, extraordinary year for public education in California."

    Schwarzenegger's $5.1 billion increase is composed of $2.3 billion in discretionary spending and roughly $2.8 billion for specific programs.

    Bob Wells, executive director of the Association of California School Administrators, said districts would prefer that less of the money come with strings.

    "That's something that we and governors always disagree about," he said.

    Wells said he would have liked to see the budget proposal provide more money for computer technology and principal training, and to assist school districts whose enrollments - and thus revenue - are falling each year.

    Plotkin, of the school boards association, agreed that more money needs to be set aside for Sacramento, San Juan and other school districts struggling with declining enrollment.

    "Otherwise, all of this new money gets eaten up by trying to sustain existing programs," Plotkin said.

    Schwarzenegger's budget proposal is likely to be amended by lawmakers.

    Passage of a state budget requires approval by Schwarzenegger and a two-thirds majority of the Assembly and Senate.

    "Whether we'll recommend spending the money in exactly the way the governor suggests, I doubt we will," said Sen. Jack Scott, an Altadena Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Education Committee.

    "I don't think we're going to vary a great deal," he said. "But we'll look at every line item."

    Barbara Kerr, president of the California Teachers Association, praised the proposal but said it is no cure-all for schools.

    California ultimately must switch from a system in which it budgets whatever it can afford for education, to a different approach, which determines precisely how much money is needed to ensure quality schools - then strives to provide it, she said.

    Kerr said the state's teacher shortage is likely to continue.

    "It's certainly better than zero," she said of the likely pay increase. "But it's going to take a lot of things, not just a decent cost-of-living adjustment, to recruit and retain quality teachers."

    Wells agreed.

    "Obviously (a pay hike) helps," he said. "But for a district with a starting teacher salary of $30,000, a 5.92 percent increase is less than $2,000 per year. Is it the solution to all our recruiting problems? Of course not."

    TOP

    Teachers union backs governor's school-friendly budget

    By Tom Chorneau, San Francisco Chronicle, May 24, 2006

    Leaders of the California Teachers Association took the unexpected step Tuesday of endorsing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget and launching a lobbying effort to ensure its passage.

    The move comes only a few months after the bitter special election in which the teachers union spent $58 million to discredit Schwarzenegger and his ballot agenda while telling voters that the governor reneged on a promise to fully fund schools.

    But now, with the apparent truce between the governor and the powerful union over school funding, a key criticism of Schwarzenegger has been removed from his re-election campaign, even before voters have chosen a Democratic challenger in the June primary.

    The union's announcement would also seem to be a problem for Treasurer Phil Angelides, who has both the CTA endorsement and has made full funding for schools a focal point of his campaign.

    "It does make it harder now to make the case that the governor is not fully funding education," said Scott Plotkin, executive director of the California School Boards Association, noting the agreement reached this month that will give schools another $2 billion next year and another $2.9 billion to be paid over seven years to improve scores at poorly performing schools.

    The governor was able to make the deal thanks to $7.5 billion in unanticipated tax revenue the state is expected to receive over the next two years. Schwarzenegger was also able to propose setting aside $3.2 billion to pay off old debts early and build reserves.

    His budget is now before the Legislature, which faces a June 15 constitutional deadline for either adopting it or negotiating a compromise with the administration.

    While observers called Schwarzenegger's agreement with schools smart politics, leaders of the teachers union took care Tuesday to limit their comments.

    "The governor's budget proposal is the good news that our students, teachers and schools have been waiting a long time to hear," said Barbara Kerr, CTA president.

    Kerr also said Tuesday that about 200 teachers from districts all over the state took a message of support for the governor's budget to the Legislature.

    But when asked specifically if the support of the governor's budget will translate into a kinder, gentler approach in November, Kerr was reticent.

    "CTA has an endorsed candidate and we stand fully behind our endorsed candidate and that's Phil Angelides," she said.

    Speaking at a press club luncheon later in Sacramento, Angelides largely ignored the CTA announcement and simply continued criticizing Schwarzenegger on education.

    "The fact is, and everyone knows this, this is the best budget we're going to get out of this governor,'' he said.

    "I know, and the teachers of this state know, that if I'm elected governor, we'll do better. We'll start climbing from the back of the pack,'' he said noting California still spends less per pupil than 43 other states.

    State Controller Steve Westly, the other major Democratic candidate, has also been critical of Schwarzenegger on school funding. Nick Velasquez, spokesman for Westly, said voters remain concerned about Schwarzenegger's broken promise to education.

    "It's great news that we have additional revenues and Controller Westly is pleased more money is going to schools," he said. "What do you do when times are tough? There are going to be years when there are huge deficits.

    "The governor broke his word and that's what matters to the people of California. He has a track record of breaking his word."

    Such rhetoric might be a hard sell come November, said Melinda Jackson, a political scientist at San Jose State.

    "I think the governor is playing smart politics, and it's fortunate that he has the money to play around with this year," she said. "This is one of the benefits of being a sitting governor, as the incumbent you can be Santa Claus and pass out money to your potential enemies."

    Dan Schnur, a Republican consultant, said there is much to be read into the teachers making such a public announcement of their support of the governor's budget.

    "When push comes to shove, the unions are going to support the Democratic nominee," Schnur said. "But there's a big difference between not supporting Schwarzenegger and wanting to destroy him. Today's announcement suggests that they are not interested in hitting nearly as hard as they did last year."

    Still, some teachers said the political trauma caused by last year's special election has not healed and the extra $5 billion isn't necessarily a cure.

    "Having to go through what we had to last fall with the special election told me more about this current governor than anything he's done since," said Greg Bonaccorsi, a teacher from Fremont who took part in Tuesday's lobbying at the Capitol.

    "My opinion is that Schwarzenegger ran on a platform that we ought to be supportive of public education and then in midstream he took a polar opposite position," he said. "That's why I find it difficult to change my mind now."

    TOP

    Hundreds of California Teachers Ask Lawmakers to Back State Budget Repayment Plan for Public Schools

    Funding Proposal Will Help Close the Achievement Gap

    California Teachers Association, May 23, 2006

    SACRAMENTO - Nearly 200 educators from across the state joined California Teachers Association President Barbara E. Kerr today in calling on legislators to support the governor's May Revision budget proposal that would restore all money owed to public schools and help close the achievement gap.

    "These much needed funds will help close the achievement gap for students in our neediest schools and those learning to speak English," Kerr said at a news conference. "The repayment dollars would move us forward, but we must build on this commitment so we can provide adequate long-term resources for all our schools."

    Under the revised budget proposal, schools and community colleges would receive all of the money owed under Proposition 98, including education's share of additional revenues. As part of the payment agreement, public education would receive more than $5 billion, including $2 billion in this fiscal year. An additional $3 billion, to be repaid over seven years, would go to our schools of greatest need and community colleges to help close the achievement gap.

    The funds will help protect librarians and counselors from potential layoffs in the 47,000-student Sacramento City Unified School District, said Marcie Launey, president of Sacramento City Teachers Association. "Our schools need the money because they have never really had enough funding."

    In the Bay Area, that money could be used to restore counselor reductions and other cuts in the 31,000-student West Contra Costa Unified School District, said teacher Gail Mendes, president of the union representing district educators, United Teachers of Richmond. "By targeting our schools of greatest need, the repayment money will be used to reduce class sizes, improve teacher and principal training, and increase parental involvement," Mendes said. "These are all proven remedies for helping students."

    Los Angeles County teachers also lobbied lawmakers today. "This money will go far towards helping our neediest students," said educator Sarah Ross in the 33,000-student Pomona Unified School District, where nearly 73 percent of students qualify for free or reduced-priced lunches. The district has ended smaller classes in kindergarten and third grade, and has cut counselors and school nurses, said Ross, president of Associated Pomona Teachers. "These funds are good news for students and teachers."

    Legislative Analyst Office Review of 2006 May Revise

    TOP

    Comments. Questions. Broken links? Bad spelling! Incorrect Grammar? Let me know at webmaster.
    Last modified: May 11, 2006

    Disclaimer: This website is the sole responsibility of Mike McMahon. It does not represent any official opinions, statement of facts or positions of the Alameda Unified School District. Its sole purpose is to disseminate information to interested individuals in the Alameda community.