Home

Mike McMahon AUSD
BOE Meetings Assessment Facilities FinancesFavorite Links

Bay Farm Single School Plan 2007/08

Bay Farm Elementary School was a K-6 school with an enrollment of 558 in 2006/07. To review Bay Farm's state Academic Performance Index scores since 2000 click here.

Disclaimer: Single School Plan were hand typed and transcribed from source documents. Please pardon the typos as the webmaster is a poor typist. While an effort was made to spell acronyms, here is a reference guide for those acronyms.

Single School Plan Components

What Did You Learn from 2006/07 Cycle of Inquiry?

  1. Looking at your data what general trends do you see? What does the data tell us about how the focus group did? How much progress did they make? How does this compare to growth of other subgroups? Is the student achievement gap closing?
  2. Bay Farm students continue to achieve at high levels. Students in every target group continue to improve over time. It appears from our test analysis of matched growth over time that all students in basic, below basic, and far below basic move to proficient. According to the performance data, our program and interventions for these students continue to make a difference in student performance.

    We are determined that every student succeed at their maximum potential. We are a high performing school overall; however, our students can still do better. We continue to address all students at their individual levels of performance and provide instruction to increase their individual skill levels. We notice a trend that we must aggressively address involving our students who perform in the advanced level. Some of our students are scoring in the lower levels of this grouping and over time slip back into proficient level. To address this condition we will continue to maintain our successful intervention programs for at-risk and lower-performing students, and will develop and implement a more rigorous academic program to assure students performing in the advanced level continue to increase their performance. We also need to identify and implement assessments that will give us more specific skill areas to address to assure deeper understandings. Each grade level needs to identify target students to observe new implementations and the effect they have on achievement of higher levels of success.

    Our Visioning Process has surfaced a second area to address: School Climate and Community. Areas identified at Visioning meetings include strengthening a sense of community, developing students who are confident, self reliant, motivated, complex thinkers, responsible for their own learning, sensitive to others, and able to apply lifeskills to everyday situations. We need to assess/collect data to specifically identify areas of focus for this year of change. We will also analyze our learning environment including transitions, time on task, distraction and motivation, and student behavior inside and outside the classroom.

  3. What evidence/data do you have regarding the level of implementation of the teacher/instructional practice and/or schoolwide practice that you planned in your last Cycle of Inquiry? Include information about what was not implemented as well as what was implemented.
  4. We continue to explore high leverage activities and strategies to maintain our high levels of performance. We also are continuing the search for more specific and individualized targeted assessments to better identify specific skill needs especially for our higher performing students. Currently, our districtwide assessments are limited in the depth of data they provide to develop specific targeted instruction for this identified group. Our Vision Bold Goal Curriculum Groups, grade levels, staff, and SSC continue to direct our energies toward the common goal of continually improving every student’s academic performance.

  5. What evidence do you have that your focus on these students has positively impacted their learning?
  6. Parent surveys, vision meeting feedback, and other discussions continue to indicate that our community feels that Bay Farm students receive a comprehensive and challenging curriculum. Performance data indicates that each year students are increasing in numbers toward our goal of 90% proficient and above, in fact, at many grade levels we have achieved this goal and beyond. Our matched scores over time indicate that students who were basic and below and have been in our program over three years move into the proficient level and beyond. Our performance data indicates a stable program delivery over time throughout the K-6 program over time. Student surveys and self assessments continue to show that our students see themselves as capable, eager learners, and that they strive to extend their learning and progress academically and socially.

  7. Is there anything else you learned in examining your data that will inform your revised problem statement?
  8. Measures Applied now allows us to review more specific data over time. We have discovered what seems to be a significant/important trend with major impact on student performance. We see that our advanced scores are actually in the lower band and some students from year to year slip between proficient and advanced. We will address this trend, solidify performance in the higher band of the advanced level, and assure that our higher performing students continue to achieve at higher and higher levels of performance. Most students are proficient/above when tested using AUSD required assessments. Grade levels continue to look for additional formative assessments/ data that will go deeper into skill instruction.

Fall 2007

  1. What are your problem statements?
  2. Problem Statements

    Student Achievement Problems

    Teacher Practice Problems

  3. What are your inquiry questions?
  4. Student Achievement Questions

    Teacher Practice Questions

  5. What are your measurable goals?
  6. What are your major strategies?

Bay Farm 2006/07 Single School Plan

Bay Farm 2005/06 Single School Plan

Bay Farm 2004/05 Single School Plan

Bay Farm 2003/04 Single School Plan

Bay Farm

2002 2003 2004 2005
Base API 914 917 927 946
Number of Students Tested 329 350 353 352
State Rank 10 10 10 10
Similar School Rank 7 7 9 10
African American  Students Tested 12 11 7 4
African American Students API N/A N/A N/A N/A
Asian Students Tested 160 171 167 170
Asian Students API 913 934 947 951
Filipino Students Tested 9 8 10 16
Filipino Students API N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hispanic Students Tested 12 15 10 9
Hispanic Students API N/A N/A N/A N/A
White Students Tested 115 116 120 119
White Students API 929 924 923 954
SED* Students Tested 8 15 13 11
SED* Students API N/A N/A N/A N/A
% in Free or Reduced Price Lunch  3 5 3 3
% of English Language Learners  8 10 8 12
School Mobility Percent* 9 9 6 6
Parental Education Average* 4.43 4.29 4.27 4.12
School Classification Index* 188.56 187.56 186.64 172.28

4 Year District API Base Data

Definitions

    School Mobility Percent - Represents the percentage of students attending the school for the first time.

    Parent Education Average - The average of all responses where "1" represents "Not a high school graduate", "2" represents "High School Graduate", "3" represents "Some College", "4" represents "College Graduate" and "5" represents "Graduate School".

    School Classification Index - A mathematically computed index using other non academic API components to create indicator of similar demographics and school environment to be used for similar school rankings.

Disclaimer: All data has been hand created. If there are questions about the validity of the data, please contact the webmaster.

Single School Plan Home

TOP

Send mail to mikemcmahonausd@yahoo.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: February 20, 2007

Disclaimer: This website is the sole responsibility of Mike McMahon. It does not represent any official opinions, statement of facts or positions of the Alameda Unified School District. Its sole purpose is to disseminate information to interested individuals in the Alameda community.