Home

Mike McMahon AUSD
BOE Meetings Assessment Facilities FinancesFavorite Links

Chipman School Plan 2004/05

Chipman Middle School was a 6-8 school with an enrollment of 621 in 2004/05that used Lifelong Guidelines and Lifeskills.. To review Chipman's state Academic Performance Index scores since 2000 click here.

On April 28th, First Lady Laura Bush visited Chipman to recognize the hard work and accomplishment of the students and staff in successfully implementing a reading intervention program. Here is an editorial about their program.

Disclaimer: Single School Plan were hand typed and transcribed from source documents. Please pardon the typos as the webmaster is a poor typist. While an effort was made to spell acronyms, here is a reference guide for those acronyms.

Single School Plan Components

Fall 2004

  1. What are your problem statements?
  2. Problem Statement

    Of the 632 students at Chipman Middle School, approximately 245 (38%) are reading below grade level on multiple measures. Within that group, there are a disproportioante number of African American and Hispanic students.

    Now that the Intensive intervention program is well in place we need to focus our efforts and resources to refining the Strategic program and supporting implementation. We need to continue to refine the delivery of programs at all levels (REACH, Strategic, Benchmark/Advanced, ELD).

    Additionally, a lack of academic vocabulary for many (in addition to our intervention students) makes accessing the core curriculum in other subjects difficult.

    While we have addressed the issue of time allowed for reading intervention and have placed the most experienced teachers with the neediest students, the data supports that chronic attendance and tardy issues plague our lowest students.

    Math: Of the 6 subgroups designated by the Annual Yearly Progress, only one sbugroup, African American, did not meet the Annual Measurable Objective.

  3. What are your inquiry questions?
  4. Student Achievement Questions

    • Are students in the intervention classes increasing their fluency rates so that they are closing the achievement fluency? Are students in the reading intervention classes inceasing their comprehension as measured by internal assessments? (REACH, Prentice Hall)
    • Are students increasing their knowledge of academic voacbulary across the curriculum?
    • Of those students who are reaching mastery in the intensive program, who are the students who have attendance and tardies as an issue? What is the ethnic and gender composition of this group?
    • Are we providing the academic support needed to improve the Math AYP scores of our African American students?

    Teacher Practice Questions

    • To what degree are reading teachers implementing the identified program for their reading class?
    • To what degree are teachers teaching and reinforcing the academic vocabulary within their grade level and department? (as measured by the local collaborative Vocabulary teaching rubric)
    • To what degree are the teachers using research based strategies to support our African American students in math?
    • What practices and policies can we implement to improve attendance and increase attendance student time in class?

  5. What are your measurable goals?
  6. Student Achievement Goals

    • 90% of students in REACH will achieve 80% or greater mastery in fluency on a daily basis and move to a higher level
    • Students in Strategic will increase their comprehension skills as measured by program assessments. By the end of the year, at least 60% of our Strategic readers will reach an identified minimum fluency rate and move into grade level reading classes
    • As measured by dat collected through the Cycle of Inquiry, focal students will increase their knowledge of academic vocabulary
    • African students will achieve 12.8 points of growth to the YO goal og 26.5 percent proficient in Math.
    • By June, absences and tardies will decrease by at least 25% from last year

    Teacher Practice Goals

    • All teachers will fully implement identified reading programs including in-class-reading assessments for corrective feedback as designed in each program and measured by coach's observation
    • All teachers will make progress in teaching academic vocabulary as mesured by the vocabulary teaching rubric
    • Math teachers will work with district math coache to identify and implement effective strategies to rasie the AYP of our African American students
    • Administration will have identified and implemented policies and practices specifically aimed at addressing the issue of attendance ammong those students in our target population

  7. What are your major strategies?
    1. Improving implementation or reading programs in all reading classes. This will include professional development, coaching, data collection and collaboration.
    2. In all classes, refine the teaching of academic vocabulary.
    3. Continue to refine our assessment tools for both teacher practice and student assessment. Create or find teacher practice assessment tools for our intervention classes.
    4. Identify and implement policies and practices that address attendance problems specifically among our intensive need students.
    5. Continue to refine and implement Integrated Thematic Instruction.
    6. Identify and implement effective practices for working with our African American students in math.

Chipman 2003/04 Single School Plan

2002 2003 2004
Base API 634 650 676
Number of Students Tested 532 684 635
State Rank 4 4 5
Similar School Rank 6 6 6
African American  Students Tested 165 224 198
African American Students API 567 568 600
Asian Students Tested 105 110 110
Asian Students API 678 714 754
Filipino Students Tested 60 89 97
Filipino Students API N/A N/A 720
Hispanic Students Tested 72 79 82
Hispanic Students API N/A N/A N/A
White Students Tested 114 145 115
White Students API 717 728 730
SDE* Students Tested 297 382 439
SDE* Students API 581 608 635
% in Free or Reduced Price Lunch  55 52 65
% of English Language Learners  24 23 25
School Mobility Percent* 18 33 24
Parental Education Average* 2.92 2.86 2.82
School Classification Index* 154.53 156.99 157.05

3 Year District API Base Data

Definitions

    School Mobility Percent - Represents the percentage of students attending the school for the first time.

    Parent Education Average - The average of all responses where "1" represents "Not a high school graduate", "2" represents "High School Graduate", "3" represents "Some College", "4" represents "College Graduate" and "5" represents "Graduate School".

    School Classification Index - A mathematically computed index using other non academic API components to create indicator of similar demographics and school environment to be used for similar school rankings.

Where no one is left behind

San Francisco Chronicle Editorial, April 29, 2005

IT'S ONE THING to say "No Child Left Behind," it's another to mean it.

With 50 percent of its students once performing below grade level, Chipman Middle School in Alameda held a comfortable spot on California's list of low-performing schools. It would have been easy to stay there, too, had the school's educators decided not to make a change and give their students an actual chance.

But they did -- and on Thursday, first lady Laura Bush paid a visit to Chipman with the goal of making it a national model for schools with at-risk students.

That's a far cry from four years ago when Chipman teachers were sent to research programs to address their students' severe reading deficit.

The team chose to implement the state-adopted REACH method of teaching, an intensive intervention program for grades four through eight for students reading below grade level.

The teachers also agreed to launch a three-tiered core program, which involved identifying "benchmark" students, that is, those who read at grade level, "strategic" students, who read one to two years below grade level, and "intensive" students, who read more than two years below grade level.

The model is based on enabling students reading below grade level to make two years' progress in one year's time by teaching an extended intervention class on comprehension, writing, spelling and "decoding," which is learning how to say the words aloud and comprehending their meaning.

It was an ambitious goal -- and a refreshing one, given that many schools with at-risk students cite budget woes, bigger class sizes and lack of quality teachers as excuses for not implementing more rigorous programs. It's always easier to blame outside forces rather than take them on.

"But not only have we implemented this program," says Principal Laurie McLachlan-Fry, "we've restructured the entire school around it. We've made it even more intensive."

Since implementing all three levels of the program in 2002, state scores for Chipman have gone up. In addition, under the REACH program, reading and writing skills have gone up 8 percent for African-American students and 9 percent for Hispanics. School-wide, there has been a 7 percent improvement.

Now, Laura Bush, building on the president's No Child Left Behind Act, cited Chipman's success in visiting the East Bay school Thursday. "I'm so glad you're in a school that pays attention to reading, because if you can read, you can do every subject," she told the students.

"Mrs. Bush is going across America and highlighting programs that have worked, that have a record of success. Chipman has shown this success," said Susan Whitson, press secretary for the first lady.

Not that it's been easy. Katherine Crawford, who has been a teacher at Chipman for nine years and is now teaching the core program, said the sessions are "draining" and the work is "nonstop," but that nothing has been more rewarding.

"They keep improving and we keep pushing," she said.

And that's the difference.

Teachers at this school care. And in a climate where low-performing schools are seen as the black eye of our educational system, it's refreshing to know that at one school, teachers remain tireless in their efforts and merciless in their demands for a better education for all students.

Making Chipman Middle School a national model is great. But let's not stop at home. Right next door, Oakland high schools have been described as "dropout factories" by a recent study of California schools.

Let Chipman be a model for them, and maybe Oakland, too, will lose its comfortable spot on the list of the low-performing schools.

It might just give the first lady another reason to come back.

Disclaimer: All data has been hand created. If there are questions about the validity of the data, please contact the webmaster.

Single School Plan Home

TOP

Send mail to mikemcmahonausd@yahoo.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: February 8, 2005

Disclaimer: This website is the sole responsibility of Mike McMahon. It does not represent any official opinions, statement of facts or positions of the Alameda Unified School District. Its sole purpose is to disseminate information to interested individuals in the Alameda community.